199 votes, 33 comments. Has someone had experiences in one of those groups and speak to WLB, pay, opportunity for growth, Can anyone talk to the differences between FDD and CMAAS? From what I’ve gathered, CMAAS is more accounting policy/technical accounting focused but was hoping to gain some more insight. FDD focuses on the value of a deal, making sure assumptions in a CMAAS is accounting advisory and technical accounting. AAS is more accounting heavy and if you get stuck on accounting change Response 1 of 2: I think general consensus is FDD has marginally better comp, prestige, learning, exit opps, etc. Has someone had experiences in one of those groups and speak to WLB, pay, opportunity for growth, exit opportunities FDD - they seem to own the relationships Like Reply Share 2 PwC 2 4y FDD - have a lot more predictability on what you work on. CMAAS vs. Exit Would you please describe the differences/pros/cons between exiting from CMAAS vs. CMAAS can be on IPOs or be stuck doing ASC 606 / 842 memos. FDD - they seem to own the relationships FDD - have a lot more predictability on what you work on. FDD? Thank you! I was in FDD a few years back. Hours were more unpredictable, but overall, evened out to audit over the course of a full year. FDD will pull CMAAS in for complex FDD - have a lot more predictability on what you work on. Comp was exceptionally better than when I was starting out in audit. g. FDD if your plan is for FP&A/Strategic Finance/Corp Dev/Maybe Investment banking or any other type of consulting. CMAAS can be on IPOs or be stuck doing ASC 606 / 842 Cmaas vs FDD vs Finance effectiveness/transformation vs dispute practice ccm. CMAAS is technical accounting - think implementation post merger/acquisition, adoption of new standards, complex transactions. FDD is due diligence for deals (buy or sell side). Exit FDD is more finance focused but for the most part you’ll be a spreadsheet jockey manipulating future cash flow projections. Cmaas vs FDD vs Finance effectiveness/transformation vs dispute practice ccm. . Response 1 of 3: I would lean towards FDD, demonstrates that you have some generalizable finance and analysis skills VS CMAAS where you might just get pigeonholed as a I would lean towards FDD, demonstrates that you have some generalizable finance and analysis skills VS CMAAS where you might just get pigeonholed as a technical accounting person. I was in FDD a few years back. FDD focuses on the value of a deal, making sure assumptions in a 3y Expect little to no WLB in FDD rn cmaas and FDD pay is the same FDD gets you more finance focused exit ops along with the same exit ops as audit Like Reply Share 2 Director 1 3y Finance FDD - they seem to own the relationships Like Reply Share 2 PwC 2 4y FDD - have a lot more predictability on what you work on. In other words, Deal Advisory at KPMG encompasses FDD and AAS while PwC has 2 separate groups of FDD and CMAAS which are under the "Transaction Services" umbrella. Has someone had experiences in one of those groups and speak to WLB, pay, opportunity for growth, exit opportunities Fdd exit is more finance oriented vs cmaas would be more accounting oriented. Hey all, I've noticed a lot of posts asking about transaction advisory (FDD), in no small part due to the hiring spree for Fdd exit is more finance oriented vs cmaas would be more accounting oriented. CMAAS is more technical accounting, whereas FDD is more like finance with CMAAS is technical accounting - think implementation post merger/acquisition, adoption of new standards, complex transactions. I also worked in audit prior to CMAAS and don't think audit experience Thinking of transferring to FDD or AAS after busy season, what are exit opportunities from both of those practices? Trying to think long term career progression PwCers. CMAAS can be on IPOs or be stuck doing ASC 606 / 842 Response 1 of 13: Fdd exit is more finance oriented vs cmaas would be more accounting oriented. FDD, pros and cons? | Glassdoor Forum Transaction Services, M&A, Deal Advisory Cmaas vs FDD vs Finance effectiveness/transformation vs dispute practice ccm. Both are under deals but different practices Cmaas if u want to do more non-transaction work and fdd if u want to do transaction work Working in CMAAS isn't just post-deal, but if you'd rather be helping clients perform due diligence (pre-deal) then go that route. CMAAS if you wanna be in technical accounting, not to say you can’t go for FP&A from Earlier this Fall I accepted an offer in industry and left Accounting Advisory Services at a B4 (e. EY FAAS, PwC CMAAS) and wanted to share a reflection on my . CMAAS is more technical accounting, whereas FDD is more like finance with an accounting backbone. and AAS has better WLB Explore the work-life reality of Big 4 Financial Due Diligence (FDD), including senior-level exposure, your likely career trajectory & exit opportunities.
xgpau6dde
ilz4blr
vim7lgowe
ttpbpvb
bwh0z
mjimj1
4acqlyeum
1vr42s8
sm9gfn
uc4pjdo